Mr. X said on 17/Jan/08
Actually Big Show is only 450 lbs. he mentioned 460 on a promo in Memphis last year before wrestling Hulk Hogan, Even at 7'0" or 7'1", 450 lbs. is obese, for any man. No man should even come close to 500 lbs. no matter how tall you are it's unhealthy.
topdweeb26 said on 17/Jan/08
Alex2: I don't really think Taker lost any height. I have some old matches of him on my computer and he doesn't look any taller back then than he does now.
Alex2 said on 17/Jan/08
Thanka Mark, glad to see there is some decent people around here like you and Alex. Since when do men like taker in early 40's loose height anyway? You normally loose height in 50's-60's, well most men i know anyway lol. And yes i cant wait for Big Show to return.
JT said on 15/Jan/08
According to this site (
Click Here), Akebono was 200 cm. (~ 6
topdweeb26 said on 15/Jan/08
nick: I think you failed to pick up on my sarcasm.
Vegas said on 15/Jan/08
not sure Mark, nash has stood beside numerous tall nba players including david robinson, oliver miller and most notably 7'2ish kareem abdul jabbar and he only looked 4 inches max shorter than him and he certainly didn't look more than 8" or so shorter than 7'6 jorge gonzales. i have also seen nash on tv dwarf 6'3-6'4 listed nfl players and this out of wrestling gear so he is a huge guy. nash played pro and college ball and was listed at 6'10 in both so its not as if we don't know what he would have been listed at in the nba.
a fairer comparison is the photos of nash next to 6'9 listed Miller and the photo of Miller next to 6'11 listed Jermaine O'Neal (Jared Jeffries with glenn is not taller than Jermaine O'Neal) this a far better than comparing two completely different guys to two other completely different guys
Click Hereat times comparing photos is a bit silly, look at rock/mamum and tyler mane/mamum, rock looks taller next to mamum yet i would bet any money that in reality mane has 5" on the rock, take peyton manning as an another example listed at 6'5 by the nfl, claims 6'5.5" himself yet only looks 3.5"-4" taller than a guy many on here say is no taller than 5'9.5-5'10 George Bush, now if that was a 6'5-6'6 listed wrestler beside bush there what do you think people would say?? i suspect he would be downgraded to 6'1 within seconds by most on this website
Click Here Mark said on 15/Jan/08
Danimal, Give Alex 2 a break. Think we're all on too much. He's got some good points to make. Think height loss people such as Taker + Wight etc can be explained by pooor posture, boots and weight etc. If coming back and has lost weight may give an impression of being taller. Most people especially early in life don't lose 2 inches. The 6'10 photo of basketball player with a 5'8 Glenn sure throws up a few questions. Same height as Manum, making claims of 6'8 for Sid and 6'10 claims for Nash look a bit crazy.
nick said on 15/Jan/08
4 inches is alot man. 4 inches is just shy of what the undertaker was under khali, 4 inches is the difference between Kurt angle and Brock lesnar, its very clearly visable. 4 inches towering.
6'8 is ignorant and just plain dumbo.
Alex2 said on 15/Jan/08
Danimal, i do realise they take a lot of toll and punsihment on their bodys from wrestling, but did you know Show has lost 60lbs since quiting wrestling and is due to return very soon.
Vegas said on 15/Jan/08
my photo didn't post, akebono (chad rowan) in 1986-87 aged 17-18 during his basketball days, back row middle of photo, number 35, he is easily the tallest guy on the team 6" taller than the next tallest number 33 to his right
Click Here Tom said on 15/Jan/08
Guys, 6.8' for Paul Wight is ridiculous - anybody who's seen him in the flesh would testify to that. He has very poor posture, due to his size. He is still very close to 7.0'(probably 6.11') when he actually straightens up.
topdweeb26 said on 14/Jan/08
Yes, Khali is minimum of 7'. Big Show, like Jason says, is 6' 8 at the most. The reason Khali and Big Show look so close in height, is because you all keep overlooking how small of a difference 4" is. I mean, to say that you're 4" inches taller than someone is like saying you're basically identical in height to that person.
Danimal said on 14/Jan/08
Alex2, you seem to live on here. You post A LOT kid. Big Show is not a typical 35 year old. First of all, he is a 500 pound man with back and knee problems and he was a wrestler for a dozen years and broke his body. He is NOT, nor is any other wrestler your AVERAGE person. If Hogan never went into wrestling, he would still be a healthy 6'5"+ man today. Kid, you have to learn a thing or two in this world.
Alex2 said on 14/Jan/08
Lol Show is 6'11 minimum
Atoadaso said on 13/Jan/08
Probably the difference in height between Wight from WCW to WWE is a combination of smaller soled shoes, height loss due to weight and age, and posture also due to weight and age. I would say Wight was at a prime height of 7'1", and is now at about 6'11.5". When another giant like Khali (7'1" and change IMO) gets in the ring with him, then he really straightens out and you can see he really hasn't lost much height. When he was new in wrestling, his height and size was his gimmick so he would probably care more about appearing taller.
Alex2 said on 13/Jan/08
I doubt you loose 1-2 inches in your mid 30's come on, most 40-50 year olds i know have lost 0.25-0.5" max so i doubt it, oh and has anybody heard? Big Show is returning to WWE, it has been officially confirmed
topdweeb26 said on 13/Jan/08
Big Show is apparently going to be coming back to the WWE.
Danimal said on 12/Jan/08
I personally believe he was that full 7'1.5" in the mid 90's. He had at least 3" on the then 6'10" Big Daddy Cool. I think he shrunk to 7'0" even by 1999 and is maybe down to 6'11" nowadays. Something happened to him for sure, as well as Taker and many others.
Mark said on 12/Jan/08
The photo @ the start still has me baffled, Wight looks 6'7-6'8 at best on it, I genuinely believe however he's around 6'10-6'11, favouring 6'10. I'm not really in to all this lost inches concept, I belive it happens but rarely, often down to poor posture. Hogan is someone who obviously has lost height but the amount is the big question.
Anonymous said on 12/Jan/08
bob sapp is 6'4.25
Danimal said on 12/Jan/08
Sapp is not 6'5". I believe Rob had him at 6'3"-6'4".
Alex2 said on 11/Jan/08
Id say 7'0.5" peak
tuga said on 11/Jan/08
The photo is akebono with 6
brother_h said on 10/Jan/08
Big Show could actually be 7'1" but he occasionally has bad posture, so he might look 6'11 1/2" or 7'0"
brother_h said on 9/Jan/08
aww man i didnt see em =[
but i do have WM21 but the camera doesnt show much of them standing nose to nose
topdweeb26 said on 9/Jan/08
The Big Show and Akebono pics have been examined so much, that it's not a big deal if the link doesn't work.
tuga said on 9/Jan/08
Sorry about the link, just check the bob sapp page, one of the last posts has 2 pics with akebono and bob sapp. It doesn
Danimal said on 9/Jan/08
He has stated both 7'1.5" and 7'0" for his height in the past. In the mid to late 90's he looked 7'1"-7'2". Since then he can look as short as 6'11".
tuga said on 8/Jan/08
Big show is I would say 7', he was 4 inches taller than akebono, who was measured at 6
Alex said on 8/Jan/08
I remember a picture of Big Show and Drew Gooden but there was no height comparison though.
brother_h said on 7/Jan/08
do u hav a link jared?
Jared said on 6/Jan/08
I saw a photo of Big Show standing next to 6'9" (in shoes) Drew Gooden of the Cleveland Cavaliers, he was slightly taller. I'd say 6'10"-6'11".
Alex2 said on 3/Jan/08
Just look at Big Shows head lol, its huge!
Alex said on 2/Jan/08
Big Show can look look different heights but I just can't see him under 6'10 barefoot at the very least. 6'11-7'0 is my estimate for him still.
height estimater said on 1/Jan/08
big show is such a hard height to estimate because of his mass, hes somewhere in the range of 6 ft 10 - 6ft 11.5 , hes definately not over 7 ft, and definately not below 6 ft 10 im gonna say 6 ft 10.5 barefoot, 7 ft in shoes
Danimal said on 19/Dec/07
NO, she was referring to his Hip Replacement. She even said it: before your new hips you had a bigger butt.
Topweed, I am an avid bodybuilder. My quads measured 27" when I was full swing into my squats and leg presses. After not having touched weights for 2 years, they were below 23". I have posted numerous pictures to this site of Hogan with longer legs. He has had HOW many knee surgeries and HAS had a hip replacement. His hips look like that of a 12 year old boy when he wears jeans today. C'mon!
topdweeb26 said on 19/Dec/07
JT: I agree. I don't think Hogan's legs shrunk at all, and Linda saying, "I miss your butt" (hope no one else paid that much attention to that line) could mean a lot of things, such as he is old now and isn't as well-built as he once was. I mean c'mon. I stopped working out for a while now, and I miss my biceps, but that doesn't mean I lost 3" off the length of my arms.
JT said on 19/Dec/07
Hogan looks pretty idiotic if the 1980s jeans still fit length-wise since he claims to have lost 3 inches over the years. I don't think his legs are any shorter, it's just that he can't straighten them like he used to.
Viper said on 18/Dec/07
How does Mike remind you of Tony Parker Gonzalo?
Danimal said on 18/Dec/07
Easy there Vegas. I know how much you love Hogan, but if you're such a DEVOUT Hogan knows best fan, you'll have seen the episode where him and his wife go for dancing lessons and she says I miss your butt. She was referring to his hip replacement. He can't work out his legs anymore because of that and is multiple knee operations and you're insulting vegas, because I posted MANNNNY pics over the years where Hogan's legs and lower body was shorter and tinier than it once had been. I don't believe those are his old pants and if they were, I can GUARANTEE you they were MADE to look perfect on his for the camera. Meaning they were PRE-adjusted so he wouldn't look idiotic.
nick said on 18/Dec/07
You guys are so wrong about mike and show in the pic....ITS AN ILLUSION. Please copy and paste the photo to a program where u can minimize it and see it from a distance. You really see the height difference. Mike can very well be 6'2 in this picture when taking into account to footwear advantage. And if he is leaning on one foot like i think and know he is almost adding another inch. Mike say is close to 6'3 in this pic and big show has atleast 8 inches on him. aLSO THE PICTURE MAY BE TILTED IN MIKES FAVOR, AGAIN POSTURE OF THE BIG SHOW CAN BE DEDUCTING A HALF INCH AND THE CAMERA LOOKS LIKE IT WAS SHOT IN A SLIGHT UP ANGLE.
ALSO, Big shows head is making it seem like less of DIFFERENCE THAN IT IS
Gonzalo said on 17/Dec/07
Mike reminds me of Tony Parker.
This pic is really surprising. The difference between Mike and Big Show is more or less the same as the difference between Shaq and Lebron James. Mike must be standing on a box or something
topdweeb26 said on 12/Dec/07
Vegas: exactly.
Vegas said on 12/Dec/07
hogans legs look short?? how come on an episode of HKB linda found a pair of jeans hogan wore from the 1980s, hogan tried them on and they fitted perfectly, except around the waist where he has gotten fatter
Scott said on 12/Dec/07
I saw the UnderTaker outside the arena in Phoenix on Monday night Raw a few years ago. I am 5'10 and he had at least 9 to 10 inches on me. He looks to be a solid 6'8.
Ghost said on 12/Dec/07
Easy there. I simply posted the video because mentioned Gollum the segement.
I think Hogan was about 6'5 in his prime and around 6'3,5 today. Khali, I say, is just over 7 feet.
Danimal said on 11/Dec/07
Ghost, what is this proving, by posting a video of a broken down 54 year old Hogan who has been severely vertically compressed. His neck looks SO short. His legs look short and brittle. All he has left are his massive arms. The man WAS almost 3" taller post 1990 and would have matched up a hell of a lot better to that 7'0" UGLY monster at that point. Hogan would be dwarfed by Andre today and he surely was never dwarfed by anyone post 1990.
Alex said on 11/Dec/07
Jason, yea there is this tall cabinet I have at my house and I measured it at 7'0 and sometimes it doesn't even look that tall buta 7'0 just seems taller but in reality they're both the same height.
Gollum said on 11/Dec/07
Does anybody have any good pics of the Great Khali and Hulk Hogan stare down from Raw last night?
topdweeb26 said on 10/Dec/07
Jason: lol yeah I did misjudge a door in drafting class before, but I have underestimated people in real life too. All I will say is that I believe you when you say the Big Show looked quite shorter than 7' to you. I don't know why he did, but I don't think you're lying. Unfortunately, we may never know for sure since he isn't in the spotlight anymore.
Jason said on 10/Dec/07
Oh, I misread what you said and thought you were talking about when you said about people under-estimating the height of that door. No, I know how tall 7'0'' is ... ****, I've slightly over-estimated someone around 6'8'' before. :)
Jason said on 10/Dec/07
Yeah, but that was with a door height. I mean, if you mark 6'3'' or 6'4'' on a wall, it doesn't look all that big - but that much of *person* is big. Now, I could be wrong (as I've always said), but I just didn't see 7'0'' or near.
topdweeb26 said on 10/Dec/07
Jason: are you quite certain that you haven't conditioned yourself into thinking that 7' is some Jurassic size, so that when you do see someone that height, you automatically think they are shorter? I've done this to people before and have been proven wrong.
Jason said on 10/Dec/07
He stood stationary about 5 feet from me for at least 20 seconds, which I've said a number of times before. Now, I'm sure it's not enough to tell for you, but it is for me.
Vegas said on 9/Dec/07
jason you never met the guy in person, you saw him at a show from probably miles back, please stop acting like you measured him or something ;)
Jason said on 9/Dec/07
Mike wasn't trying to downgrade Big Show ... he was trying to upgrade him! :0
topdweeb26 said on 9/Dec/07
Alex: that pic of the Big Show with Vegas' friend is a very good pic. Because not only does he have pics with the Big Show, he has pics with other wrestlers. He also has a pic with Kane, and Kane was about 4 inches taller than his friend, and Big Show was about 8 inches, which makes Big Show about 4 inches taller than Kane, and we know that he is. So, Vegas' friend is very strong evidence that support Big Show's height. With Mike's picture, this is the one and only pic we have.
I think I am mistaken in that there are two pics, I thought there was at first because they looked slightly different. Now that I am looking at it closer, I think the second one is the same pic. I still don't know exactly what was done to make it different though.. but anyway, JT once did a comparision of the pic with Vega's friend and the pic with Mike. And Mike actually slightly edged out Vegas' friend in height, and Mike is supposed to be 6' 1.5. Funny, if I raise myself up, I become approximately 3 inches taller... strange how Mike would edge out Vegas' 6' 4 by .5 - 1".. I think he is on his toes, I simply don't believe him, unless he posts another pic. Vegas' friend on the other hand, had a few pics of himself.
Alex said on 9/Dec/07
Topdweeb, what do you think of the picture of Big Show and Vegas's 6'4 friend?
topdweeb26 said on 8/Dec/07
Jason: I initially thought they were the same pic too, but after I looked at it closer, they do seem to be different. Maybe it just appears that way. In either case, I do agree with you that it shouldn't be used as evidence. I think the pic above and the other one cancel each other out and neither should be used as evidence for anything.
Alex said on 8/Dec/07
Wait, Mike has 2 pics with Big Show? I thought the second picture someone just fixed and made him seem like he was standing up straight.
Even in the 2nd picture with Mike, Big Show doesn't look 7'0. More like 6'10.
Jason, Big Show looks 7'0 with Vegas' 6'4 friend though.
cantstop25 said on 8/Dec/07
thats a good point alex why isnt vegas friends picture up, or any of vegas's photos for that matter? I mean there height is more legit then anybody else who have posted photos, simply because they have stood in front of a height chart
Jason said on 8/Dec/07
I didn't know there were two pics - I thought it'd just been played around with. Checking it out, I would have to assume this is one of Mike's pics? Anyways, I just pointed this out since some were acting like it's case closed when it's conjecture. I'll be happy to agree with Big Show looking 7'0'' in a pic if you show me one, just as I was with Khali/Lance Storm recently on Khali's page. ;)
topdweeb26 said on 8/Dec/07
Jason: for one, we are simply taking Mike's word on him not being on his tippy-toes, we don't know that for sure... don't you think it is at least a little weird that we have two pics of Mike and the Big Show, obviously within the same instance, but in one, Mike is significantly shorter than the one above? My theory is that someone took two quick photos of them, one where Mike stood normally, and then in the other, he raised up quickly, and that's the one we have above.
It's like you're so biased that Big Show isn't even clsoe to being a 7-footer, that you can't even at least admit that there seems to be something funny with the picture, especially in light of him seeming a lot shorter in the photo that isn't posted here. Most of us who believe that Big Show is 7' at least admitted initially that the pic above does contradict our belief. You can't even at least concede on points that don't support your view, you simply stop posting for a long time until something else comes around.
topdweeb26 said on 8/Dec/07
Alex: yeah the picture above sucks, especially now that we have another pic of Mike with the Big Show where Mike seems significantly shorter than he does in the pic above. Simply not good pics to use as evidence.
Alex said on 8/Dec/07
The picture that I think some have forgot about is the one of Big Show and Vegas's 6'4 friend where Show looks 7'0. Don't know why that picture was ever not posted on the top of this page.
The picture of Mike and BigShow fixed we can't use either because we don't know for sure if Mike is on tip toes or not.
Jason said on 8/Dec/07
Mike's already said Show was standing straight, he wasn't on his tippy toes, and the ground was level. I could play around with pics I don't think are representative of how things actually are, too...
Atoadaso said on 8/Dec/07
That 2nd photo is probably just realistic. Based on the photo above, he is clearly either significantly taller than 6'1.5", or he's on his toes. Based on his posture and body alignment with Big Show, i'm saying he's up on his toes. Look at where their waists together. This site should take the pic down or get a new one, cause that one is no good.
Jason said on 8/Dec/07
Mike's already said Show was standing up straight. Far out ... what's next?
jameslong said on 7/Dec/07
he is a peice of s@@t he makes james patrick look like he had a tummy tuck and he also may i say look,s like king kong but white. but i see you are now 450 pounds of flab well when you get too 360 pounds i,ll be happy .ps yo fatty.
topdweeb26 said on 7/Dec/07
I don't get it, why does Mike seem significantly shorter all of a sudden? Is that not the exact same pic? That really goes to show you can't just trust one pic.
JT said on 6/Dec/07
Interesting find there cantstop25 (
Click Here)
topdweeb26 said on 6/Dec/07
canstop: that's pretty weird.. it's the exact same picture, but now Mike looks a few inches shorter in that pic... and it makes it more apparant that Show is not standing straight at all, but is leaning quite a bit... can't tell if that's what it "really" looks like or if it is just the shading of the pic that makes it seem that way... either way, I don't think this gets the Undertaker off the hook of being 6' 2.
topdweeb26 said on 6/Dec/07
Vegas: I've seen the Undertaker twice in real life before, and I would seriously pin him down to about 6' 7 or 6' 8.
cantstop25 said on 6/Dec/07
hmmmm could this be what the picture really looks like?
Click Here cantstop25 said on 6/Dec/07
lol to the people who ACTUALLY believe taker is 6'2" (which i doubt any of them are serious) if hes 6'2" then sylvia is 6', now I find this hilarious because im 6'4.5" legit and that tells me that if i was in the ufc I could be listed at 7'2.5"!
Alex said on 6/Dec/07
Sylvia looks at least 6'6 to me.
Ray said on 6/Dec/07
Yeah, that video is one that shows somethign Vegas; I always liked that video. It shows Taker having Sylva by what looks like 3" if Taker had his head straight. Taker most likely IMO had on work boots which he seemed to wear a lot around that time period (big evil/red devil days); so his workboot could have given him around 1.5-1.75" or so height advantage and not sure what Sylva was wearing but my guess would be Nike's or somehting that would give around .75" height advantage so I'd say Taker had 1" height advanatge over Sylva's footwear and Taker appeard 3" taller or so, so I'd say Taker has Sylvia by definitely 2". Sylvia is billed at 6'8" but my guess is Sylva 6'5-6'6" and Taker 6'8". That video I think was from 2002-2003.
Vegas said on 6/Dec/07
topdweeb26 what do you really pin taker at??
i don't know if you have seen this video before of taker with various dudes from ufc including 6'8 listed tim sylvia (belt on his shoulder) at 1:56
Click Here funny thing is ufc listed sylvia at 6'10 for a while.......
Alex said on 6/Dec/07
I did read something about Khali being a legit 7'0.5 on a wrestling site and if so then Big Show would be a bit under 7'0 then. 6'11 1/2. Khali does not have Big Show by more than 1.5 inches at most. Don't know where you guys are coming up with Khali 2-4 inches taller.
UT actually could have looked 6'3 in that backstage video too. LOL
Jason said on 6/Dec/07
I thought we were all just kidding about the Undertaker being 6'2''... lol
Dream34 said on 6/Dec/07
khali is officially 7'0.5" tall, so show is about 6'10". i met kane and he seemed to be about 6'7", so is taker.
topdweeb26 said on 5/Dec/07
Vegas: lol I know, I'm just kidding around, I know that the Undertaker is really 6' 4, the 6' 2 was just a joke :)
Alex said on 5/Dec/07
Topdweeb, you're not serious about thinking UT is really 6'2?
Would be funny as hell is Big Show was 7'0 and UT was 6'2.
mike m said on 5/Dec/07
when show and khali went to chokeslam taker the ring,khali looked about 2 inches tller imo.so witthat if khali sandsalegit 7,2" the it,s probably safe to say that show is 7,0".
Vegas said on 5/Dec/07
topdweeb26 says on 4/Dec/07
Maybe Big Show is 7' while the Undertaker is really just 6' 2.
:D no, i can guarantee 100% taker is not 6'2, i saw sherri martel's son jarred standing next to taker and he had 5" on him and jarred is a big guy himself, he told me he was 6'2, looked at least 6'1.5" to me, he was only up to takers eyeline and both were in sneakers.
topdweeb26 said on 4/Dec/07
Maybe Big Show is 7' while the Undertaker is really just 6' 2.
Alex said on 4/Dec/07
Even though UT looks 6'2 in that backstage video it makes Big Show looks 7'0 though and not 6'6 that that guy claimed. UT is obviously at least 6'6-6'6.5 today still.
mike m said on 3/Dec/07
big show has 4 inches on kane,so if kane is 6,8" then show is 7,0".
Danimal said on 1/Dec/07
Whatever Taker ONCE WAS, he is no longer that.
Alex said on 1/Dec/07
Also if UT was 6'2 then Big Show would be 6'6 as that guy claimed too. And it would downgrade everyone on this site having guys like HHH, Batista, Rock all under 5'10.
Alex said on 1/Dec/07
Most evidence puts UT at 6'6-6'7.
Vegas said on 1/Dec/07
i met taker and without question he ain't 6'2 but we are just saying he looks shorter back stage for some reason, camera angle is the main reason.
in that khali video taker only looks 6ft, i don't think davari was much more than 5'8-5'9
nick said on 1/Dec/07
Click Heretaker at 5 seconds when standing very straight and looking up is looking very tall against the rock
Ray said on 1/Dec/07
This sounds like joking around to me because if anyone thinks The Undertaker really is 6'2" should start to rethink some things. 6'6" is low balling him too; 6'7.5" seems right for him as listed here on this site.
nick said on 1/Dec/07
Click Hereeveryone can appear shorter back stage, I honestly believe that kane and taker are the same height but if u pause this video at 45 seconds kane isnt looking his height. But u can catch how much taller he really is in the video
In the yakem taker video taker looks the same height at yankem. He has a high forhead and his hair weghs down making the top of his head really were his height is.
Big Show said on 1/Dec/07
Viper says on 30/Nov/07
So there is more evidence of a 6-2 Undertaker?
Not as much evidence as there is of Undertaker looking at least 6'6. The evidence of Undertaker looking 6'2 are mostly with very deceiving camera angles.
richard-environment said on 1/Dec/07
He's atleast 6'8 how can anyone say he is 6'2 lol. And they are saying that frrom a ground view camera angle.
nick said on 1/Dec/07
Click Here the undertaker looking very 6'8 with austin, who knows how tall he would look if he looked straight. Pause the video at 5:05 and u can really see the major height difference to a 6'1 guy. Also they footwear seems to be like it always is at this time about only an inch just like austins. So this is about how they would look if they were barefoot. Al
Viper said on 30/Nov/07
So there is more evidence of a 6-2 Undertaker?
Big Show said on 30/Nov/07
Undertaker does look short there. Backstage segments are sometimes very misleading. I posted a video awhile ago on the Undertaker board where Undertaker only looked 3 inches taller than Stone Cold.
Alex said on 30/Nov/07
Thats just one clip. Many others he looks 6'6-6'7 at least.
Viper said on 30/Nov/07
It would have been crazy If that guy used this video clip to actually back up his 6-2 sighting.
Jason said on 30/Nov/07
Maybe that guy who said he's 6'2'' is right. :)
Alex said on 30/Nov/07
Viper, if you look at the 24-25 second mark when he's standing there and you can see his full body he honestly does look 6'2. LMAO
Viper said on 29/Nov/07
Undertaker looks 6-2 in the video. Man, Im taller than Taker.
Alex said on 29/Nov/07
Khali and Big Show looks about dead even in height there.
Alex said on 28/Nov/07
Big Show, I read that too. Last I read he was down to 450lbs, 420lbs is good weight for him. Thats the weight he was in 99-2000.
Alex said on 28/Nov/07
4 inches shorter than 5'10 Davari. That puts UT looking 6'2 like Will claimed! LOL
But those camera angles can kill your height though.
Danimal said on 28/Nov/07
Vegas, I promise you Taker, like Hogan and so many others have suffered the pains of going under the knife and looking the way they do today as a result. PRE-2000 Taker was taller. I'd put so much money on that.
Vegas said on 28/Nov/07
thing which surprise me most about that video is how short undertaker looks, he barely looks 4" taller than davari and looks a foot shorter (due to camera angle) than khali at 28 seconds when he runs at him just before show enters the shot. its not the first time taker has looked short(er) back stage though...
topdweeb26 said on 28/Nov/07
Vegas: yeah you're right, he does look slightly taller than Khali and from the glimpses we see of his footwear, they don't appear any different than what he normally wears. Can definitely rule out the idea that there is a few inches between Khali and Show, if anything, they are the same height.
Big Show said on 27/Nov/07
Apparently Big Show was also backstage at Survivor Series. His weight is now down to 420 lbs and he's in far better shape than he's ever been in WWE according to himself. Big Show is still training to be a boxer but is unsure if he will ever compete in a match.
Vegas said on 26/Nov/07
hadn't seen this video before big show looks slightly taller than khali from 58 seconds onward
Click Here Vegas said on 26/Nov/07
nash is 5" taller than adams in this video
Click Here Vegas said on 26/Nov/07
yeah he was listed at 6'8 as evil japan sympathising crush too between 1993-1994 i don't remember what they billed him at though when he came back as prison gimmick crush and then later biker crush
Jason said on 26/Nov/07
Yeah, 6'8'' when he was a face. I remember 6'7'', before that, in Demolition. 6'6'' when he came back to the WWF in 1996.
Alex said on 26/Nov/07
He was listed at 6'8 when he was Haiwaian Crush.
mike m said on 26/Nov/07
The press conference memphis wrestling hogan vs the great paul wight,face to face i paused the video and i didn,t see no more than 5-6 inches between the two.we don,t see the footwear,maybe hogan is wearing cowboy boots,don,t know.to conclude paul wight did,nt appear 7 foot to me,more like 6,10".
mike m said on 26/Nov/07
if khali is a legit 7,2" imo big show is around 6,11",7,0",imo i think there could very well be a few inches between khali and big show.
Jason said on 26/Nov/07
They announced Crush as being 273lbs in a singles match I remember from his Demolition days (vs Shawn Michaels).
Danimal said on 25/Nov/07
Alex, I promise you that Crush (as he was known as in 1990 when he joined the already existing Demolition with Ax and Smash) was given a 6'6"-6'7" listing at that point. Only much later did they boost that to 6'8". Was a HUGE Demolition fan and Powers of Pain. That's when wresting was GREAT.
Gretz said on 25/Nov/07
Great pics JT,the pic with Vegas`s 6'4" friend looks right(Rob maybe you should put that at the top of the page,or at least under Mike`s pic for comparison).Also, Show looks slightly over 7'0" in the pics with 6'5" Adams.
Jason said on 25/Nov/07
Yeah, the mentor had Crush at 193cm/6'4''.
Alex said on 25/Nov/07
I do think Brian Adams was a legit 6'5 too and he was billed at 6'7 and even 6'8 at times too.
The photo with Vegas's friend I think is more accurate then the picture with Mike though.
ted T said on 25/Nov/07
In that pic the difference is less than 20 cm!No way Paul Wight has shrunk so much.That photo is a joke.
anonymous 1 said on 24/Nov/07
6-7 inch difference in height there.
Danimal said on 23/Nov/07
I think the Mentor had Crush at 6'4". Ask Viper.
JT said on 23/Nov/07
Gretz, since you haven't posted in a while (
Click Here). That's Vegas's 6'4" friend looking 6'0". This is why we need to look at as many pics as possible (and ideally full body shots) when trying to pin down a person
Gretz said on 23/Nov/07
True Alex,But for Big Show I would say the distance from the top of his head to the tip of his nose would be roughly 8 inches.Making him only 6'9.5" in the pic with Mike.The problems are,is Mike really 6'1.5" bare foot?and what kind of footware are each wareing?Also,we can`t see how their legs are positioned.So I think this photo is misleading,there is enough evidence out there to put Big Show at 6'11"+,and a peak height of at least 7'0" in my opinion.
Alex said on 22/Nov/07
The bottom of the nose to the top of the head should be about 7 inches for the normal person.
Danimal said on 22/Nov/07
Ian, unless you're a 7 foot monster like the Big Show, I somehow don't think you'll have the same facial dimensions and measurements as him ;). Sorry.
Alex said on 22/Nov/07
The picture with Big Show and Mike is still kinda a mystery.
nick said on 22/Nov/07
now, remember, mike is leaning on 1 foot giving him an inch advantage, the big show isnt fully erect taking away an inch, and the big show has a 6.5 inch forhead and around 3 inches to the bottom of nose. Believe me its an illusion, i have made height charts with these two and big show comes to 6'11 6'11.5 in the picture, show is 7 foot.
Gretz said on 20/Nov/07
I was just reading about a sumo wrestler,(Mainoumi)who got a silicone implant in his head,to meet the minimum height requirements to be a sumo wrestler(170cm about 5'7").So I think its safe to say the 6'8" listing for Akebono is accurate.By the way,getting an implant in your head to meet the height requirements is no longer allowed.
Ian said on 20/Nov/07
Mike comes up to the bottom of Bigshows nose in that picture so I can't see how that could be over 10inches from his nose to top of Bigshows head. Its not like he has a massive nose and forehead is it. He used to be billed at 7FT2 but the wrestlers always exaggerated their height. I've measured my nose to top of my head it was just about 7.5-8inches. So I can't see him being over 6ft10 in this photo.
Alex said on 20/Nov/07
Its too bad Shaq didn't get a picture with Khali. I'd love to see that. Same if Big Show was still there. We need to see Shaq near the much taller guys.
Big Show said on 20/Nov/07
Click HereHere are some backstage pics of Shaq with some WWE wrestlers. No Khali though.
Gretz said on 19/Nov/07
Great pic Vegas,if that 6'8" listing for akebono is is correct.Than Show looks exactly 7'0" in that pic,or it least within a quater inch.I still can`t figure out that pic at the top of the page though,maybe that guy is standing on something.
cantstop25 said on 19/Nov/07
no offense mark but saying that youve lost almost all credibility
Silverwolf said on 18/Nov/07
survivor series is in Miami. Shaq will be present at the event. Hopefully they can get some backstage pictures of him and khali.
Gretz said on 18/Nov/07
It`s kind of odd how Show has almost a full head on 6'1.5" Vinnie Mac in the pic that JT posted.Yet the 6'1.5" guy at the top of the page almost comes up to shows nose.Could there have been lifts involved in the McMahon pic?
anonymous 1 said on 17/Nov/07
no vegas, 3-4 inches
Anonymous said on 17/Nov/07
Howz it going guys??? Cable at home blew completely, so after a long time I finally get the chance to post from a cyber :(
Alex said on 17/Nov/07
Vegas, in barefeet I think Big Show had a bit more on him. Roughly 4 inches he had on Akebono in their sumo match.
Vegas said on 15/Nov/07
akebono was listed at a height in the wwe?? i don't remember that, akebono was always listed at 6'8 203cm in sumo after the age of 19 and that listing is a million times more important than any wwe listing. i find it funny how people quote wwe listings when it suits them but ignore wwe listings 99.9% of other times ;)
if there is only 3 inches here i can safely say that akebono's forehead is about 2 inches long
Click Here anonymous 1 said on 15/Nov/07
wasn,t akebono listed 6,8" in sumo,prior to wwe?
Big Show said on 15/Nov/07
In wrestling nothing is for sure. Everyone thought that Shawn Michaels would never wrestle again after his back surgery but he came back...eventually.
Big Show has rejected a WWE offer earlier this year (which was a very lucrative deal and he didn't even need to wrestle), so Big Show definately is done for wrestling in the short term. I've read earlier this year that he was training at a boxing school and wanted to become a boxer. Lately it's been awful quiet around Big Show. Haven't heard, read or seen anything about him since July.
Mark said on 14/Nov/07
Anonymous 1. Akebono was listed as 2 different heights in WWE, 1st 6"8 then 6"7, therefore realistically he won't be taller than 6"7 as WWE usually ex. heights. Therefore 3 inches (which I agree with) would make Wight around 6"10 (again which I believe.
topdweeb26 said on 14/Nov/07
I'm pretty sure Wight is done wrestling for good.
Atoadaso said on 13/Nov/07
Anyone know if Big Show is comign back to WWE? He should fued with Khali, they hinted at it awhile ago...
Big Show said on 11/Nov/07
Click HereIf some of you have a rapidshare account and like to see all of Big Show's PPV matches. Click to the link above. I've uploaded the first part of a Big Show megapost that contains all of his PPV matches from 1999 til 2002.
anonymous 1 said on 11/Nov/07
big show vs akebono,they were both barefoot,that,s absolute proof that big show is at least 6'11" barefoot,cause akebono is listed at 6'8" and there is a 3 inch difference in height.
Big Show said on 6/Nov/07
JT says on 5/Nov/07
Big Show and Vince from 1999 (Click Here) The quality of the original video is poor but he looks to have about a head size on Vince.
Here, I've converted it from my dvd and uploaded it on Youtube. The quality is a little bit better here.
Click Here Big Show said on 6/Nov/07
Click HereHere's a photo from the Wrestlemania XV dvd which shows Big Show's height billing. This shows Big Show to be billed as 7' when he just got into the WWF, not 7'2. He was billed 7'2 when he started to feud with Kane.
JT said on 5/Nov/07
Lee Marshall looks around 5
anonymous 1 said on 5/Nov/07
lee marshall not sure,but he looks about 5,8" maybe 5,9",not positive about that though.
topdweeb26 said on 5/Nov/07
mike m, chill out man, I made that post to back up what you were saying in reference to J A. It wasn't an attack on you at all.
Gamma_2008 said on 5/Nov/07
Big show is 6'8 at full posture barefoot, very tall and large so he appears 7ft quite easily if in ring gear.
Anonymous said on 5/Nov/07
Andre 7'2
Big Show 6'10
Kane 6'8
Nash 6'9
Taker 6'7.5
Khali 7'1
Matt Morgan 6'7
Studd 6'7
Reese 7'0
Gonzalas 7'7
Hogan 6'4
Batista 6'3
HHH 6'3
Rock 6'3
Sid 6'7
Jones 6'9
Silva 7'2 These are actual heights!
Big Show said on 5/Nov/07
Click HereDoes anybody know how tall Lee Marshall is. Big Show looks gigantic.
topdweeb26 said on 4/Nov/07
mike m: my comment was made to support yours about billed heights, it wasn't made to offend you. It was in fact, aimed at J A.
mike m said on 4/Nov/07
top dweeb ,yes i already new that,i,m talking about when kane use to wrestle on his own ,before he hooked up with big show ,im talking way back wwf days ,ok proffesor ,thank you.
topdweeb26 said on 4/Nov/07
Even if you believed in the billed heights, then the fact that Big Show is billed at 7' and Kane is billed at 7', but the fact that Big Show has like 4 or 5 inches on Kane, common sense should tell you that if Big Show is 7' then Kane is no where near it.
mike m said on 2/Nov/07
kane 7'0" that,s a laugh,your right big show ,at one time i too believed their billed heights to be their true heights,it,s almost like how they bill their weight also,like saying jamie noble is 200 1bs to me he doesn,t look over 1801bs.
Ray said on 2/Nov/07
Well, Khali has 5 inches on Taker IMO; could be .5-1" more than that but Taker came up to Khali's eyebrow's when standing tall so 5" IMO plus the back of Taker's head is higher/peaked more than the rest; so if Khali is 7'1" then Taker is around 6'8"
Big Show said on 2/Nov/07
J A says on 2/Nov/07
most, or all, of you are wrong. undertaker is 6ft 10, kane is 7ft, big show is 7ft, kane is 7ft, khali is 7ft 3, andre the giant was 7ft 4
I guess you also believe in Santa Claus aswell! You're just going by their billed heights and it's no secret that most wrestlers have overbilled heights.
J A said on 2/Nov/07
most, or all, of you are wrong. undertaker is 6ft 10, kane is 7ft, big show is 7ft, kane is 7ft, khali is 7ft 3, andre the giant was 7ft 4
Ghost said on 31/Oct/07
Wait a minute Danimal...
You have Taker at 6'6 or a bit over and Khali at 7'2...
Something doesn't add up.
JT said on 30/Oct/07
Big Show can still straighten his back as of 2006.
Click Here Because of the high camera angle, the top of Cena
Danimal said on 29/Oct/07
Vegas, I've seen those kind of matches before on old VHS tapes. It just goes to show that a once healthy guy like Tracy Smothers (especially in that video) can become what he has become today. Kind of makes it a little easier to believe that men like Hogan, Taker, Andre, Piper, Billy Graham, and so many others have lost a considerable amount of height with the 20-30 years of beatings they've taken, not considering surgery and AGE of course, seeing the average man loses around 1 1/4" anyways by a certain age, by natural causes.
Danimal said on 29/Oct/07
Gollum says on 28/Oct/07
Kane and Taker are around 6'8 and Show 6'11-7'0.
Uhhhhhh, no. Taker WAS close to 6'8". Today 6'6"-6'6.5".
dave said on 29/Oct/07
I know they fudge a lot of the heights but Taker did look 6'8/6'9 next to Khali.
Vegas said on 29/Oct/07
met and talked with ex wwf/wcw/ecw star tracy smothers on saturday. Tracy is only 45 years old and in his prime he wrestled unmuzzled bears
Click Hereanyways today tracy is barely able to stand for more than a minute or so (he had to sit down and do stretches on his back/legs after signing a few autographs) and he is all hunched over (very similiar to how andre was towards the end)
tracy's current condition really showed me how much damage pro-wrestling can do to the human body!
topdweeb26 said on 29/Oct/07
What's up with Show's eyes in that first pic JT posted with Lesnar? Looks like he hadn't slept in weeks or something.
Alex said on 29/Oct/07
Shawn G may be a younger kid like 16-17 or under. At that age of you're going going to believe billed heights. I bought most of those heights up until like 20. LOL
Gollum said on 28/Oct/07
Kane and Taker are around 6'8 and Show 6'11-7'0.
topdweeb26 said on 28/Oct/07
ShawnG: Kane is not 6' 10 barefoot, nor is the Undertaker 6' 9 barefoot. Those are billed heights, not their real heights. Kane is really around 6' 7 or 6' 8.
Alex said on 27/Oct/07
JT, in the pictures with Shane and UT he looks at the least 7'0. With Lesnar he can look as short as 6'10 sometimes. Also with Lesnar was when he had put on weight as for the other ones he wasn't as heavy.
Danimal said on 27/Oct/07
ShawnG says on 27/Oct/07
now bigshow is 7'1 barefoot cause he was a inch or less shorter then khali cause khali is 7'2 barefoot and kane 6'10 barefoot and undertaker is 6'9 barefoot i no kause i have read about it an also they say it wen u ask them
Kid, one day when you grow up a little, you'll understand that not everything you read is true.
ShawnG said on 27/Oct/07
now bigshow is 7'1 barefoot cause he was a inch or less shorter then khali cause khali is 7'2 barefoot and kane 6'10 barefoot and undertaker is 6'9 barefoot i no kause i have read about it an also they say it wen u ask them
KingNick said on 26/Oct/07
oh and Vegas, real good Show/Kane pics. Those are much better than them on a ramp, they're actually standing next to each other dead on. Looks like a 4" - 5" difference to me. Whatever Kane's real height is, I think he's around 6'9.5" to 6'10" in his wrestling boots.
KingNick said on 26/Oct/07
I know this isn't too much of a difference, but I use to think Big Show was 6'11" barefoot but the more and more I'm seeing these pics with him and Khali with the line drawn I'm thinking he's an even 7'. I do still think Big Show had advantage in his footwear all throughout his career, but I think it's just to make him look even MORE imposing. Remember, WCW billed him as 7'4" and WWE originally billed him at 7'2". I think up until the end of his career he wore shoes that made him 7'1.5" to 7'2". I still would put Khali at 7'1".
Alex said on 24/Oct/07
Shamrock could be 5'11 but no more than that.
topdweeb26 said on 24/Oct/07
Vegas: sheesh, after looking at the pics of Big Show and Kane, it is totally mind-blogging how the WWE bills Kane at 7' and Big Show at 7'.
anonymous said on 24/Oct/07
that,s like a 5'10" man standing next to a 4'8" man basicly,big height difference.
topdweeb26 said on 23/Oct/07
Notice how Ken Shamrock is about 5' 10 and that's about the same amount Big Show towers over that 5' 10 limo driver, and that's when Big Show is in sandals. Just thought I'd point that out before someone tries to claim Show is wearing massive lifts.
nick said on 23/Oct/07
wow show looks ,massive in that video, if you told me 7'3 7'4 i would believe it. Obviously that isnt true but it says a lot, also that was back 6 years ago or so so his posture was better.
topdweeb26 said on 23/Oct/07
JT: again, good job. If
Michael Jordan is around 6' 5 or 6' 6, then Big Show is definitely in the 7' range, unless someone wants to argue that somehow Big Show is hiding lifts in his open toed/heel sandals. That pic above is looking more ridiculous all the time.
Vegas said on 23/Oct/07
interesting photos JT, thats not the first time big show has been as tall as the ceiling, they make alot of 6'7 ceilings it seems, lol
cena and big show; if this photo shows anything it shows how bad big shows posture is and that was from a match almost 4 years ago now
Click Herekane and show
Click Herei am sure someone can explain the huge height difference between 5'10 (6'1 UFC listed) ken shamrock and big show here 2 minutes into this video, stilts i bet ;)
Click Here Big Show said on 23/Oct/07
dave says on 22/Oct/07
Gary Godsey? Khali looked an easy 6 or 7 inches taller than 6'7'' Godsey.
Yes but he's also closer to the camera. So deduct at least an inch off, making him 7'1 max.
Click Here JT said on 22/Oct/07
This guy with Big Show is in the 5
dave said on 22/Oct/07
Gary Godsey? Khali looked an easy 6 or 7 inches taller than 6'7'' Godsey.
Big Show said on 22/Oct/07
dave says on 22/Oct/07
For starters, Big Show has only claimed 7' for his height, Singh has claimed 7'2'' and sure does look it in a lot of pictures. I mean why would guys this big lie about their height?
Big Show has said on the Conan O'Brien show he was around 7'1, and later he just said he was 7 foot (but that was during the time WWE billed him as 7 foot). A lot of male people lie about their heights, even tall people. Singh does look 7'2 sometimes, except not when he's around taller people such as Big Show, Undertaker or that 6'7 Football Player.
dave said on 22/Oct/07
For starters, Big Show has only claimed 7' for his height, Singh has claimed 7'2'' and sure does look it in a lot of pictures. I mean why would guys this big lie about their height? I can see someone 5'8/5'9 lying...LOL. Secondly, once again Vegas that isnt a conclusive picture either. Notice where the camera man is. They look the same height there I give you that, but its just a weird angle thats all - we've seen that countless times. I would be willing to et my house if we saw Singh and Big Show barefoot on even ground, Khali would come out as the clearly taller man - anywhere from 1.5 to 2 inches. Again, you guys can disagree all you want.
Alex said on 21/Oct/07
I'd like to see 7'0 actor Tiny Ron who looks a legit 7'0, anywhere from 6'11 1/2 to 7'0 1/2 with Big Show. That would be a good picture. Looking at him alone I think he may edge out Big Show a bit.
Vegas said on 20/Oct/07
topdweeb26 says on 20/Oct/07
Or it's like Willy the school janitor from the Simpsons. He looks normal when he's in his clothes, but is really buff as hell
LOL
personally i think its all about cameras and lighting, plus some well applied oil. Khali in person is about a 5'6 140lb weakling but the way WWE film him makes him look 7ft and 380lb or thereabouts.
topdweeb26 said on 20/Oct/07
Or it's like Willy the school janitor from the Simpsons. He looks normal when he's in his clothes, but is really buff as hell.
Alex said on 20/Oct/07
I'm actually medium framed and muscular and I can look big in normal cloths like t shirts and long sleeves, but I just don't look big in stuff too baggy stuff. Some people are the opposite.
JT said on 20/Oct/07
Click Here Good thing Vince positioned himself closer to the camera or he
topdweeb26 said on 19/Oct/07
dave: you're the one who said you *guarantee* us that Big Show is wearing big footwear, so the burden of proof is on you to show that to be the case. Can you at least explain why the WWE would let the Big Show wear big lifts to make Big Show as tall as Khali when they bill Khali a full 3 inches over Big Show, and when the two of them met up, they only posted pics that favored Khali? It doesn't make any sense whatsoever. I am in agreement with Vegas, Big Show and Khali are virtually the same height. The fact that Khali is billed 3 inches taller than Show, and the fact that their footwear looks approximately equal from an outward appearance, I would venture to say that Show isn't wearing lifts. Look, Vegas and Alex have posted a pic of my former supervisor from the Air Force with the Big Show. In the Air Force, we took very good measurements of height, and my supervisor was more than an inch taller than Mike. And that pic was of the Big Show in street clothes, and it was a fully body pic and you could see the ground. Much much better than the pic above. But yet, Mike appears to be much taller than my former supervisor. The pic above simply an anomalous pic. There are so many pics of the Big Show looking 7' but yet, some people just want to pic on the one above just because it supports there position. Look at the pic Chris posted. Mike would be just barely shorter than the Undertaker. Is the Undertaker really only 6' 3 or 6' 4? I don't think so. In fact, JT compared the pic above with the one of the Big Show and Vegas' 6' 4 friend, and Mike turns out to be an inch taller than Vegas' friend.
Vegas said on 19/Oct/07
dave says on 19/Oct/07
im basing it off pictures other than the staredown between Show and Khali. Thats not conclusive at all, the camera that the photo was taken in is hundreds of feet away in the stands, if you're going to say they're the same height based on that one stadium picture then by all means go ahead, but im going to use some logic here. Khali looks 16/17 inches taller than 5'10 Daivari on the red carpet. Big Show looks 8/9 inches taller than 6'1.5 Mike. You do the math
it looks to me like you are using one photo (mike/big show) & (khali/davari) and then ignoring everything else
what is your excuse here in this photo, big show towers over "your" 5'10 davari here too
Click Here Jason said on 19/Oct/07
Click HereJohn Cena looking like a giant with Kurt Angle. The angle's actually favouring Angle (lol) and he isn't far enough away to be *that* small.
Vegas said on 19/Oct/07
jones and ddp were further from the camera from what i remember. You have to agree though that hong man choi looks a legit 7'2 with Terkay, at the very least 7'1 in that video.
Chris great photo, big show is the furthest back in that photo and still has 6" on undertaker (the exact same amount he had on that video i posted a while back and the photos JT linked a day or two ago) and at least 10" on vince (who is standing well in front). This is one of the last times big show was standing full straight i think
dave; are davari and mike the same person, was the photo taken in the same location?? please link newspaper headlines of khali's stats during his bodybuilding days and we will compare them to wights basketball days ;)
nick said on 19/Oct/07
Click Herea more likely scenario with the undertaker to full posture. Roughly a 4 inch difference which isnt shocking at all and goes along with their respective heights. Just more evidence to support the heights they are entitled
Jason said on 19/Oct/07
dave says on 15/Oct/07
''Vegas, Khali is an enormous man, so all the clothes he wears are probablyt tight to the bone, and that is why he appears leaner and meaner in street clothes, I know what Jason means there. Of course when he isngt wearing a shirt you see just how huge he is, his arms are 3 or 4 times bigger than a 200 pound mans...scary.''
Yeah, I don't get that. He looked slimmer in clothes than in the ring. I think it might be because his frame size isn't in proportion to his musculature. Not that Khali is small-framed (LOL..........), but he's not as naturally robust as Big Show and Andre. I know that muscular guys who are small-framed can look ''big'' in a tank top or shirtless, but normal fully clothed.
Jason said on 19/Oct/07
''They are, hehehe Click Here Click Here I first suspected Akebono might be as low as 6'7". It looks like he has 6
Jason said on 19/Oct/07
Vegas says on 11/Oct/07
''to be fair to jason, he never said khali looked 6'9 to him, he said his cousin thought khali might have been 6'9 from a distance. i have a funny feeling jason saw a 7 foot khali in sneakers but doesn't want to admit it.''
I didn't think he looked 7'0'', but I couldn't tell for sure. Though I spotted him a number of times, I never got that close to him/ground level & too many people around him a couple times I did. And I had to factor in his shocking posture; he could barely even walk (he needs to get off the juice pronto and get his weight r-i-g-h-t down ... uhh, then he'd lose his job lol). I did notice he had to duck a bit to walk through the hotel reception door when they were all leaving, which suprised me ... next time I'm there I'll check it's height.
I agree 197cm/6'5 1/2'' for Sylvester Terkay is likely right ... but that'd make (on the Nathan Jones page) Nathan Jones look 6'8'' with him & DDP like 6'2 1/2''. ;)
Anyways, I'm back (tentatively lol)! Been terribly busy & blew too much time here on this thread a couple of weeks ago, so kept away from the site a while... :)
dave said on 19/Oct/07
Big Show is towering over Taker there. Those people look like they've entered the land of the giants, heh.
Alex said on 19/Oct/07
Yea, Rock can't be 2.5 inches taller than HHH. Rock always had an inch on HHH.
Chris said on 19/Oct/07
Hey guys - I just posted this photo in the Undertaker's category..but for those of you that don't visit that one ....Here is a picture from 2002 or 2003 with Big Show, Undertaker and Vince posing backstage
Click Here dave said on 19/Oct/07
You cant tell footwear just by looking at the boot. Ever hear of insol lifts? Its possible Big Show stuffed some in his boots for a little boost. Im not saying its for sure but dont rule it out. Vegas, im basing it off pictures other than the staredown between Show and Khali. Thats not conclusive at all, the camera that the photo was taken in is hundreds of feet away in the stands, if you're going to say they're the same height based on that one stadium picture then by all means go ahead, but im going to use some logic here. Khali looks 16/17 inches taller than 5'10 Daivari on the red carpet. Big Show looks 8/9 inches taller than 6'1.5 Mike. You do the math.
topdweeb26 said on 19/Oct/07
BTW, if either of the two (Big Show or Khali) were wearing lifts when they met face to face, ti would only make sense that Khali would be the one. WWE billed Khali to be 3 inches taller than Show, so why would they let Show wear lifts to become just as tall as Khali? It wouldn't make sense at all. And WWE.com posted only pics at very extreme angles of the two when they met face to face in favor for Khali. So this stuff about Big Show wearing lifts to become just as tall as Khali makes no sense at all. WWE would have loved for Khali to be legitimately 3 inches taller than Show, but in reality, Khali might not be any taller than him.
topdweeb26 said on 19/Oct/07
JT: Thanks for the pic, Big Show's boots actually don't look any bigger than Khali's. And notice how straight Khali is trying to stand, lol. He's literally arching back and even when he is doing this, he is still only same height as the Big Show.
Vegas: I think you're right, I think Big Show and Khali are the exact same height.
JT said on 18/Oct/07
dave says on 18/Oct/07
I guarantee you Big Show had more help in his boots than Khali did and Khali was still 1 inch/ 1.5 inches taller.
Click Here Their footwear is pretty comparable as well.
Click Here Alex said on 18/Oct/07
Big Show's boots appeared to have 1/2 inch bigger heel. Khali at the very most is 2 inches taller than Big Show barefoot.
Vegas said on 18/Oct/07
dave says on 18/Oct/07
I guarantee you Big Show had more help in his boots than Khali did and Khali was still 1.5 inches taller
prove both claims......
dave said on 18/Oct/07
I guarantee you Big Show had more help in his boots than Khali did and Khali was still 1 inch/ 1.5 inches taller.
Alex said on 18/Oct/07
If you look on the Kevin Nash page you'll see that Nash next to 5'8 Mamun looks taller than Big Show next to 6'1.5 Mike. I'm saying in general based on those pictures Nash would be a bit taller since Big SHow looks 6'9 max here and Nash looks 6'9 at least on his page.
topdweeb26 said on 18/Oct/07
Vegas: If you don't think there is really anything between Khali and the Big Show, then why do you think Big Show is 6' 11 and Khali is 7'? I've noticed when Big Show and Khali stood face to face, Khali stood unusually straight, and he carries his shoulders high (90 degrees to his head) while Big Show stood casually and doesn't carry his shoulders as high as Khali.
Vegas said on 17/Oct/07
this is the best evidence we have of triple h in streets
Click Here the bald guy is 6'3 listed Will Sasso, at the start of the video triple h looks shorter (due to the camera being behind sasso like it was in that punked episode with kutcher)
New Member said on 17/Oct/07
Those are good Comparisons, Vegas, Glad you agree with most of them, and your prolly right about HHH, 6'1 seems to short is rock is around 6'3.
JT said on 17/Oct/07
Big Show with Ed Leslie (Brutus Beefcake) (
Click Here) and with Dusty Rhodes, who
Vegas said on 16/Oct/07
New Member; your heights
Kane 6
New Member said on 16/Oct/07
Thanks Viper, Vegas what is your opinion about the rest of my estimations.
I meant to put HHH at 6'2, my fualt,he was about .5 inch shorter than Kutcher when they shook hands and when they were side by side.
Viper said on 16/Oct/07
That new member's height estimations are not bad at all, except he says that Rock has 2.5 inches over Triple H, which looks to be impossible.
Vegas said on 16/Oct/07
mark henry was listed at 6'3 in the olympics, that changes the complexion of alot of stuff if true, do you have links???
Alex; there is 3" between show and nash in that photo from 2002, the difference is more than half wights forehead, 2" there would give wight at max 3.5-4" between his eyeline and the top of his head.
Alex said on 16/Oct/07
Can't see how HHH would be 6'1 and Rock 6'3.5. There was never more than 1 inch between those 2 in their faceoffs.
Show didn't have huge lifts against Khali. He may have had 1/2 inch advantage but no more and with that it was only about an inch difference or maybe less.
Yokozuna only 6'0? He looked at least 6'1-6'1 1/2.
Bret hart I actually think could have been 6'0 because he was the same height as Austin unless Hart was in bigger footwear.
Vegas said on 16/Oct/07
1.Cena's "offical" myspace was fake, according to some interview for a website cena said he was 245lb :) he is about 225lb in person, so yes he does lie, lol
2.nash had a least 2" on taker circa 1995; numerous pictures backstage have been posted of the two, they never have a staredown at WM12 so how can you tell there is 1" between the two from that match??
3.the camera is always behind kutcher in the hhh punked episode so its impossible to estimate heights. Kutcher was the SAME height as christian cage so no way was he taller than HHH, triple h also had an inch over Will Sasso in streets and sasso is taller/at least as tall as kutcher.
4.where is your proof big show wore any lifts (never mind huge ones), khali and big show LOOKED the same height, why would wight wear lifts to look the same height if he is billed a full 3" shorter?? i can counter that claim by saying khali wore huge lifts, i have no proof but sure it doesn't matter, lol
5.Lex luger has a 6'3 college and pro football listing.
Alex said on 15/Oct/07
JT, a good 2 inches between Nash and Big Show in 2002.
New Member said on 15/Oct/07
Pleae rate my estimations, they are based of 5 years trying to pin these guys
Kane 6
nick said on 15/Oct/07
hes 7 feet tall lets get over it. THE REALITY IS, Kevin nash is a legit barfooted 6'9.5, and the big show has him by three inches, so hes 7 feet tall end of story
dave said on 15/Oct/07
Vegas, Khali is an enormous man, so all the clothes he wears are probablyt tight to the bone, and that is why he appears leaner and meaner in street clothes, I know what Jason means there. Of course when he isngt wearing a shirt you see just how huge he is, his arms are 3 or 4 times bigger than a 200 pound mans...scary.
anonymous said on 14/Oct/07
let,s say show wore 2 inch lifts ,and he appeared 3 inches taller than 6'10" nash,that would still place show an inch taller than nash barefoot at 6'11"if you take away the 2 inches,much like we see with show barefoot and akebono barefoot,show still appeared to be at least 6'11".
topdweeb26 said on 14/Oct/07
JT: good pic of Nash and the Big Show. Looks to be around 3 inches of difference there. I want to point out something. Vegas has shown that Big Show's boots only give about 1.25" of height. Even if Big Show were to take off his boots and lose the 1.25" inches, then he'd still be taller than Nash, and Nash I'm sure isn't barefooted. So there just no way the two are "really" the same height. So in other words, Big Show would be taller than Nash even if Nash had on his wrestling boots and Show was barefooted.
anonymous said on 14/Oct/07
big show looked 2 inches taller than 6'10" nash,maybe 3 inches tops.
topdweeb26 said on 14/Oct/07
JT: the camera angle doesn't really look like it favors either one to me.
Vegas said on 14/Oct/07
i know we shouldn't keep bringing up jason but one of his comments has totally baffled me; he said when he went to the wwe show back in july khali looked huge (as in muscle-wise huge in the ring) but when he met him in streets an hour or two later he looked much smaller?? this i do not understand, does khali have some sort of machine in the back to pump up his muscles, lol, how can he look smaller in person than in the ring??
Alex said on 14/Oct/07
Jason originally said 6'8 for Big Show and 6'11 1/2 for Khali and there was no 3 1/2 inches between them.
JT said on 14/Oct/07
Big Show and Taker from 1999 (
Click Here) It looks like a 6 + inch difference but the camera angle does favor Big Show. This at least rules out any 6
topdweeb26 said on 14/Oct/07
Vegas: I remember a while back when Khali first entered the WWE, Jason said that if Big Show and Khali ever stood face to face, then he would bet that Khali would have several inches Show. Well, they went face to face, and Khali barely edged Big Show out in height, and in fact, at times they looked dead even. Did this make Jason upgrade the Big Show? No, instead it made him downgrade his opinions on Khali.
Vegas said on 14/Oct/07
it seems strange why they would inflate akebonos height and then claim he was the tallest yokozuna ever!! i have seen photos of sumos been measured and weighed so they do carry out these procedures. Sumo is an ancient sport dating back hundreds of years, its more a way of life than a sport to be honest, honestly i can't see them overbilling their wrestlers, especially not 3-4", thus diluting the tradition (what would be the motivation for something like that)
akebono looked a legit 6'8 next to Hong Man Choi, Giant Silva and Reme Bonjasky all barefoot in the middle of the ring. He looked taller next to Choi than legit 197cm Sylvester Terkay did.
here is a match from 1994 of akebono where he completely dwarfs the other sumo (Takanohana K
Alex said on 13/Oct/07
Topdweeb, I doubt he's much less than his barefoot if his height is inflated so 6'7 would be very least he is then.
anonymous said on 13/Oct/07
there is definitely more than a 5 -6 inch difference between mike and show,show is not 6'7" not 6'8", nor 6'9" show is 6'11".matt morgan is 6'8" show had him ny 3 inches,nash on the other hand is a legit 6'10" wight appeared 3 inches taller i think mostly due to lifts,barefoot i doubt it would be more than 2 inches at most.
topdweeb26 said on 13/Oct/07
I don't think American athletes really exaggerate their heights except for pro-wrestlers, who aren't real athletes. But I do think most American athlete give their stats based on how they look in a game. For example, my dad told me when he play football, they gave his stats when he wore kleets and his equipment (height and weight) because that's how his stats were during the game. Makes sense. Sumos on the other hand go at it barefooted with less clothing than you would wear in normal public.
I have a friend who is a student of Gracie Jiu-Jitsu, trained by Ryan Gracie. I am assumed he has met Royce before. My friend would know if he is 5' 11 or not because my friend is 5' 11 himself. I doubt Royce would exaggerate his height to 6' 1 since the entire promotion of Gracie Jiu_Jitsu was that size, strength and age didn't matter in a real fight as long as you knew GJJ. In fact, that's why Royce was chosen to represent GJJ in the UFC, because he was small statured. It would be counter productive to GJJ to exaggerate his size. Next time I see him, I'll ask him if he has ever met Royce and if Royce was any taller than he was.
Jordan said on 13/Oct/07
I dont think Sumo wrestlers inflate thier heights like american athletes. I think Akebono could be a legit 6'8, and if not, 6'7. 6'6 seems to short for him.
topdweeb26 said on 13/Oct/07
Alex, why 6' 7? Not saying he's definitely 6' 8, but I have no good reason not to think otherwise at the moment.
Alex said on 13/Oct/07
Topdweeb, the shortest possible Akebono would be is 6'6 and thats even too short I think. I think he's 6'7 though.